The Yes Men vs. Chevron – 1:0

Chevron Corp. announced a new global advertising campaign this week aimed at showing Chevron as a “real people” corporation, and admitting to abuses that companies usually try to hide.

source code of «Radical Chevron Ad Campaign Highlights Industry Problems»

Like I said some hours ago:
Haha. The Yes Men did it again … this time: Chevron. http://www.chevron-weagree.com/ #oil #spill #activism #chevron

The e-mails I received w/ the (fake) press releases titled «Radical Chevron Ad Campaign Highlights Victims» and «STATEMENT: Chevron Deplores Subterfuge, Investigates Options» had raw header data like “Received from:” and IP-ranges like previous Yes Men newsletter e-mails. Only the “Sender:” falsely stated something like “x@chevron-press.com” and “x@chevron-corp.com” which leads (now) to the official “chevron.com” but has a different registrar/registrant information than “chevron.com”.

WHOIS excerpts:

«Radical Chevron Ad Campaign Highlights Victims»
(still online, 20101018.2220)
From: Chevron Media Relations
chevron-press.com

  • IP Address: 184.106.131.150
  • protected domain
  • Protected Domain Services Customer ID: DSR-2798929
  • Registrar: Spot Domain LLC
  • Created: 2010-10-17
  • Expires: 2011-10-17
  • Updated: 2010-10-17
  • Timestamp: 1287416924.2116 (Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:48:44 GMT)

chevron-weagree.com

  • IP Address: 184.106.131.150
  • protected domain
  • Protected Domain Services Customer ID: DSR-2798846
  • Registrar: Spot Domain LLC
  • Created: 2010-10-16
  • Expires: 2011-10-16
  • Updated: 2010-10-16
  • Timestamp: 1287388186.8559 (Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:49:46 GMT)

«STATEMENT: Chevron Deplores Subterfuge, Investigates Options»
From: Chevron Corp.
chevron-corp.com

  • IP Address: 184.106.131.150
  • protected domain
  • Protected Domain Services Customer ID: DSR-2798845
  • Registrar: Spot Domain LLC
  • Created: 2010-10-16
  • Expires: 2011-10-16
  • Updated: 2010-10-16
  • Timestamp: 1287420781.4625 (Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:53:01 GMT)

chevron.com

  • IP Address: 96.17.15.8
  • Registrant: Chevron Corp.
  • DNS 146.23.4.135 / 146.23.68.233 / 146.23.196.13 / 146.23.212.13

My conclusion: somehow the Yes Men knew about the upcoming Chevron campaign and started the spoof before Chevron or they (The Yes Men) had the campaign/spoof idea and Chevron reacted very quick w/ a counter-campaign.

Anyway, that stunt was a typical Yes Men guerrilla action.

Update (20101019.0409): It’s getting better. On the page «Chevron Deplores Pre-emptive Spoof Ads, Investigates Options» IP Address: 184.106.131.150 “they” link to Advertising Age’s article «Chevron “We Agree” Advertising Campaign Highlights Concerns With Oil Industry Problems» … little WHOIS: IP Address: 184.106.131.150 but every other link goes right off the spoofs address to the official Advertising Age’s website at IP Address: 205.234.169.36.

advertisngage.com
(pointing to a FancyIndexing enabled webspace!)

  • IP Address: 184.106.131.150
  • protected domain
  • Protected Domain Services Customer ID: DSR-2798952
  • Registrar: Spot Domain LLC
  • Created: 2010-10-17
  • Expires: 2011-10-17
  • Updated: 2010-10-17
  • Timestamp: 1287420781.4625 (Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:48:57 GMT)

vs.

adage.com

  • IP Address: 205.234.169.36
  • Registrant: Crain Management Services Inc.
  • Registrar: Network Solutions, Llc.
  • Created: 1995-03-09
  • Expires: 2019-03-10
  • Updated: 2009-03-31

Two duped companies on one day. Yehaa, Yes Men!

[hat tips to CJ Sveningsson, without his tweet responses I wouldn’t go so far to make this post finally — and to good.is who did a nice recap.]

Ideale und Twitter

»Wir arbeiten nicht für Organisationen, Unternehmen oder Personen des öffentlichen Lebens, die die Umwelt oder unsere Mitmenschen bedrohen.«

parismedia, website

vs.

»Wie lange muss sich ein Land von Robin Wood Öko-Taliban,Sittler-Sekte & Park-Stasi erpressen lassen? Heute räumen: http://bit.ly/8YtqUq* #S21«

parismedia, twitter

und auch …

»S21: Als emanzipatorisches Unternehmen mit Hauptsitz in Stuttgart begrüßen wir die aktuelle Schlosspark-Räumung!«

parismedia, twitter

* http://stuttgarter21.de/

Kill The Spill

Two weeks ago a single blog post from an it and design company (Unify Interactive) made me angry and I decided to kick them off from my news reader. You want to know why? Here you go …

«[…] a company that spends $ billions every year and risks much more in an effort to help meet the world’s demand for petroleum […] has to endure criticism from uninformed ingrates […]

[…] The childish and oblivious people behind things like these re-imagined BP logos and countless other public commentaries and observations will never in their lives have to commit to the sorts of risks that BP employees and others in the petroleum industry make every day. These folks do these things and risk all because the world demands that someone do this dangerous and thankless job. […]

[…] when as a result of terrible mistakes (which will always occur) bad things happen, the industry receives venom and criticism from the very ones who directly caused the magnitude of the result. It’s a shame that too many are too uninformed or just too stupid to grasp these facts and the excruciating ironies that accompany them. […] the world needs the product that BP and their industrial brethren collect. […]»

Unit Interactive, Irony

That’s it — no big thing. I had no plan to write about it.

But today I read from another companies blog (Woo Themes) that they — and three other companies: MetaLab, Squarespace and CampaignMonitor — are going «active» showing some initiative to do good things and to assist w/ restoration of wildlife in the area …

«British Petroleum’s well has been pouring thousands of barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico for over a month, killing thousands of animals and obliterating any sea life in its path. To make matters worse, there’s no end in sight. […] These animals need out help, donate now!»

Kill The Spill

A new initiative from 4 companies and it hopes to generate funds that will be donated to the National Wildlife Foundation.

And if I take that in account — ⅕ is bad, ⅘ is good — than it’s not to late and we can do good things.